The latest federal attempt to regulate the internet must be revised to protect free expression, a former Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission chair yesterday told the Senate communications committee. Cabinet since 2019 has introduced bill after bill to regulate web content. None have passed to date..“The CRTC should not forget it is Canadian consumers who choose what we want to watch,” said Konrad von Finckenstein, retired chair of the Canadian Radio Television and Telecommunications Commission. “This choice is driven by market forces.”.Bill C-11 An Act To Amend The Broadcasting Act would see the Commission regulate commercial internet programmers like Netflix. The bill does not define “commercial.”.Von Finckenstein complained the bill granted “vast powers to the CRTC” and recommended senators amend it to specifically exclude user-generated content and independent YouTube channels. “Let’s face it, this Act is about money,” said von Finckenstein..“It’s about getting money from the streamers to pay for Canadian content production,” said von Finckenstein. “YouTube presents a special problem because it has both user-generated content and commercial content.”.Von Finckenstein recommended a “YouTube exemption” to the bill stating regulation “applies only to online undertakings which have more than 100,000 subscribers in Canada or revenue in excess of $100 million,” and specifically exempt Canadian users’ homemade uploaded content..“There is of course no intention to cover user-generated content and thereby respect the freedom of speech of Canadians,” he said. The House of Commons heritage committee earlier rejected similar amendments..Von Finckenstein is a director of the Canadian chapter of the Internet Society that criticized Bill C-11 as federal over-reach. “When all you have is a hammer everything looks like a nail,” the Society wrote in a submission to the House of Commons heritage committee..“C-11 is based on the tragic illusion all audio and audio-visual content on the internet is a program and that any person who transmits a program on the internet is a broadcaster rather than a communicator,” wrote the Society. “It is neither possible nor beneficial. Internet streaming services are simply not broadcasting.”.Bill C-11 follows a similar Bill C-10 An Act To Amend The Broadcasting Act that was introduced in 2020 but lapsed in the last Parliament amid widespread opposition. A separate Bill C-36 An Act To Amend The Criminal Code introduced last June 23 proposed to criminalize online content deemed to “foment detestation or vilification.” It also lapsed in the last Parliament..The House of Commons yesterday passed Bill C-11 under closure by a vote of 208 to 117. The Senate is expected to take it up in September following Parliament’s two-month summer recess.
The latest federal attempt to regulate the internet must be revised to protect free expression, a former Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission chair yesterday told the Senate communications committee. Cabinet since 2019 has introduced bill after bill to regulate web content. None have passed to date..“The CRTC should not forget it is Canadian consumers who choose what we want to watch,” said Konrad von Finckenstein, retired chair of the Canadian Radio Television and Telecommunications Commission. “This choice is driven by market forces.”.Bill C-11 An Act To Amend The Broadcasting Act would see the Commission regulate commercial internet programmers like Netflix. The bill does not define “commercial.”.Von Finckenstein complained the bill granted “vast powers to the CRTC” and recommended senators amend it to specifically exclude user-generated content and independent YouTube channels. “Let’s face it, this Act is about money,” said von Finckenstein..“It’s about getting money from the streamers to pay for Canadian content production,” said von Finckenstein. “YouTube presents a special problem because it has both user-generated content and commercial content.”.Von Finckenstein recommended a “YouTube exemption” to the bill stating regulation “applies only to online undertakings which have more than 100,000 subscribers in Canada or revenue in excess of $100 million,” and specifically exempt Canadian users’ homemade uploaded content..“There is of course no intention to cover user-generated content and thereby respect the freedom of speech of Canadians,” he said. The House of Commons heritage committee earlier rejected similar amendments..Von Finckenstein is a director of the Canadian chapter of the Internet Society that criticized Bill C-11 as federal over-reach. “When all you have is a hammer everything looks like a nail,” the Society wrote in a submission to the House of Commons heritage committee..“C-11 is based on the tragic illusion all audio and audio-visual content on the internet is a program and that any person who transmits a program on the internet is a broadcaster rather than a communicator,” wrote the Society. “It is neither possible nor beneficial. Internet streaming services are simply not broadcasting.”.Bill C-11 follows a similar Bill C-10 An Act To Amend The Broadcasting Act that was introduced in 2020 but lapsed in the last Parliament amid widespread opposition. A separate Bill C-36 An Act To Amend The Criminal Code introduced last June 23 proposed to criminalize online content deemed to “foment detestation or vilification.” It also lapsed in the last Parliament..The House of Commons yesterday passed Bill C-11 under closure by a vote of 208 to 117. The Senate is expected to take it up in September following Parliament’s two-month summer recess.
